Rants (RSS)

Just me complaining. Those of you who know me know this rarely happens (*cough*)

My surfing habits and that irritating 'double-click a word to pop-up a definition' (NY Times!)

I am a web-surfing multi-tasker.  For example, I currently have 7 tabs in this Firefox window and 5 more tabs in 2 other firefox windows going simultaneously.  When I mean "going", I mean they are usually queued up for me too read.

So, I will go to a site like digg.com and I will Ctrl-Click the links I want to read and they all load in background tabs.  I will then subsequently do this with any links in the pages I read.  I will also look up topics or definitions of words with a double-click (highlight the word), right-click, "s" (Search Google For 'word').  This, again loads another tab.

Anyway, so I frequently hop from one tab to another and Alt-Tab between Firefox windows, since I categorize a full "session" represented by a single window.  For example, I will have one that is my "email" window.  I will have tabs for McKearney.com email, Gmail, Myspace (kind of email-ish), etc.

All this said, I obviously bounce around.  So, when I leave one page to look at another, I often need a place-holder to show where I was.  So, I double-click a word to highlight it.  This way, when I come back, my place is held.  In comes the New York Times (among others).

So, the New York Times recently made it off of my shit list because they decided to stop requiring registration just to read the news.  Well, they very quickly made it back on the list because they added this "helpful" feature for people.  If you double-click any text on the entire page, they take the highlighted text and search for a definition for you and pop up a lovely window with it, without asking you if you want it.  Nice.

I first toyed with the idea of using Greasemonkey to add an additional "Are you sure you want to look this up?" question, but I quickly realized that I would never answer that question with a "yes".  So, I looked at the source HTML for the web page.  It begins with this:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<script src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/common.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/article/articleShare.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/Tacoda_AMS_DDC_Header.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/fileit.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/common/screen/DropDown.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/common/screen/modifyNavigationDisplay.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/common/screen/altClickToSearch.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/js/util/tooltip.js"></script>


I bolded the line that caught my eye... this one is the culprit, so I decided to use Adblock Plus (which is usually used to block images) to block that URL.  So, I fired up the Adblock Plus configuration and added "http://*.nytimes.com/js/common/screen/altClickToSearch.js" to the list.  I reloaded the page and... voila!  No more obnoxious "oh, you meant to look up the meaning of 'the'.." logic.

This doesn't get the NY Times off of my shit list, since they did it in the first place, but it at least makes it tolerable if I want to view something on their site.

One note:  This only works for the NY Times, obviously.  So, I will probably have to figure this out again with another site.  It may require Greasemonkey.  Either way, I don't care.  I'm the one in control of my web browsing, not you!
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Warning... VERY Politically Incorrect

This is one of the infinite reasons that I hate religious people (obviously a bit of an over-exaggeration):

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-847

WHY THE FUCK DO WE NEED TO RECOGNIZE ANY FUCKING RELIGIONS AT ALL!!!!!!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHh

1) Don't our legistlators have more important things to do than to encroach on my religious freedom?   Here, let me name a few:
    - American currency is in the shitter
    - Iraq
    - Afghanistan
    - Border Security.
    - preventing Britney Spears from polluting the gene pool anymore

2) How much money is it costing the taxpayers so that these assholes can diddle themselves while talking about how much better their fairy tales are than everyone else's?  ("Jesus could beat up Muhammed".. "Oh yeah, Vishnu could kick all their asses!".. Let's just have an imaginary Royal Rumble with Jesus, Muhammed, Buddha, Jehovah, God, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, Zues, Odin, Santa, and The Tooth Fairy and Mothra while we're at it... settle it all right now)

3) Poverty
4) Crime
5) Electoral Abuse
6) Corporations Controlling the country

God, I am so angry right now, I could kill a cute baby seal with my bare hands and eat its liver.

PLEASE PEOPLE.  Go Vote For Ron Paul!!!  Put Some Sanity back in the government!!

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

At least we're not the only ones ruining our educational system...

Here in the US, we have people trying to teach Religion (Creationism/Intelligent Design) in our Biology classes.

Well, In the UK, we have people putting politics and soft, wishy-washy topics in their Physics classes...

WTF folks?  Physics is one of the coolest, nerdiest sciences there is.  Why the hell are they talking about Bio-fuels and renewable energy?  WTF does that have to do with Physics??  Even if you ignore the politics part of it, what are you measuring or observing when you talk about bio-fuels versus any other kind of fuel?  How much energy does it produce?  What's the rate of energy production?  Physics is all about numbers.  It sounds to me like a bunch of granola-crunching Al Gore-worshipping luddites took over the Physics curriculum. 

Way to go, idiots!
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Uhh... I thought "Bling Bling" was dead....

Some people have said that "Bling Bling" was dead as a saying as soon as white people like Kelly Ripa started saying it.  If there was ever a need to pulverize that horse into protoplasmic goo, well, Mattell has stepped up for us with  the Barbie "My Scene" "My Bling Bling" Barbie Doll

Basically, it's the "Materialistic Whore" Barbie, in my opinion.
posted by Tom with 3 Comments

leave it to a VB programmer...

OK, I've always been an admitted snob when it comes to Visual Basic.  To me, Visual Basic has always represented the blocks-with-letters-on-them version of languages.  Basically, most of the people who are really big fans of VB fall solidly under the category of "Don't Want Him/Her on My Team".  I know, this will upset some people, but anyone who knows me knows that I don't really care :)

Here's what made me say the title:

I was google searching for an algorithm to give me the intersecting point of two Line Segments.  For those non-math weenies out there, a "line" is an infinite thing.  So, when you ask for the intersection of two lines, you may get a point extremely far away from your area of interest.  A "line segment" on the other hand is what you generally consider a line: the connection of two points. 

In looking around, I found this code which, by the way, doesn't solve what I want.  It solves the "line" intersection:

    'Returns the point that the lines cross and stores into LinesCross if the lines do in fact cross
    Public Function Intersect(ByRef Ln As geoLine, ByRef LinesCross As Boolean) As geoPoint
        Try
            'Calculate Denominator
            Dim Det As Double = Ln.m_A * m_B - Ln.m_B * m_A
            Dim Res As geoPoint = New geoPoint((Ln.m_C * m_B - Ln.m_B * m_C) / Det, (Ln.m_A * m_C - m_A * Ln.m_C) / Det)
            LinesCross = True
            Return Res
        Catch
            'Lines are parallel (or do not intersect within the range of a double)
            LinesCross = False
            Return New geoPoint()
        End Try

    End Function

OK, this is a Cardinal Sin of exception handling.  (S)he's using exception handling for logic flow!  That's 30 lashes with a cat o' nine tails to me.  Of course a VB person may applaud his/her ingenuity...

T

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

those f-ing bastards!

This kind of shit pisses me off...

So, the early adopters of HDTV will NOT be able to watch HD-DVDs!?!?!?!?

WTF!?  We're the ones who bought your shit so that the technology actually succeeded!  Without us, there would not be HD TVs!!  We took it on the chin so that we could get the technology early.  Now, we're getting f*cked because we spent extra money in the beginning!?  What kind of shit is that!?

Man, I'm angry at this.
posted by Tom with 413 Comments

I'm not one to suggest people sue very often, but...

Some british government agency whose name I won't learn confiscated some software being sold when the didn't even know it was breaking any kind of license!  It turns out they were wrong!  WTF?  Let's just start arresting people because they acted like they could be doing something wrong!!   Assholes

You'd think that people in charge of things like this might have some f-ing idea about what they were doing!  What a bunch of friggin idiots! 

My reaction is so totally out of proportion, but this really pisses me off.

posted by Tom with 2 Comments

Please, people, learn what "broke" means!!

Yet again, I just read "if it isn't broke, don't fix it".  Grrrr...

Hearing that makes me want to smack people.

Broke means:

  1. Without funds or impoverished - "I have no money; I'm broke."
  2. The act of damaging something (past tense) - "He broke his arm when he fell down drunk"

The Mother-F-ing word is BROKEN!!!!!!
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

The problem I have with our coverage of Iraq / Afghanistan...

I have been reading a lot of the news about Iraq & Afghanistan ever since before "we" went there.
Today I was reading an article at the Baltimore Sun about an air strike.

Apparently, we were going after Ayman al-Zawahri and he wasn't there.  Supposedly a bunch of strangers came to visit a man in a small village and this man's house was the target.  The CIA thought he was al-Qaida.  Who knows if he is?

Here are some statements from the article:
  1. ".. By their count at least 30 people died, including women and children..."
  2. "On Saturday, more than 8,000 tribesmen staged a peaceful protest in a nearby town to condemn the airstrike, which one speaker described as 'open terrorism.'"
  3. "Zaman, whose home was destroyed, told AP he was a "law-abiding" laborer and had no ties to militants. He was not hurt but said three of his children were killed."
  4. "Doctors told AP that at least 17 people died in the attack. But at one destroyed house, Sami Ullah, a 17-year-old student, said he alone lost 24 of his relatives"
OK... I'd like to address these as I see them:
  1. Just like people expect "us" to lower numbers, would one not consider that this is an inflated number?  Also, every friggin article states "including women and children".  No shit!  You drop a bomb on a village, there will be what is callously called "collateral damage".  Why does "the media" need to point it out EVERY SINGLE TIME?
  2. Do these 8,000 people actually know anything about whether or not the target was actually valid?  Would they rather we march a million-strong army through the streets like the USSR did?  Whether you like it or not, airstrikes are the most humane way we can handle the situation.  As far as it being terrorism: anything that makes you afraid could be considered terrorism these days.  If this target was valid and the people who matter most (the ones doing bad things) realize that we can get to them anywhere, then I am glad that we are practicing this form of "terror" on the exact people we want to affect.  Unfortunately, others will be affected too.  If the majority, the innocent bystanders, realize that these people are targets, maybe these people will become pariahs and the innocent people will either make them leave their villages or at least leave the area, thus isolating them and making them easy targets.  It sucks being in a country that has an active war waging, but I don't think the Afghanis or the Iraqis properly appreciate that this type of war allows them the closest semblance of a normal life as possible during such difficult times.  The media never points that out, do they?
  3. Would you expect him to say "Phew!  I'm so glad I skipped out on that.  It would have put a damper on my plans to blow up a military base!".  Of course the guy's going to say "I'm innocent" and then try to gain sympathy right after.  Unfortunately, the statement would be the same whether he was guilty or not.
  4. So,  who should we believe?  Doctors?  or one person?  Who knows?  Though this reminds me of another article (which I can't find) where, after a (non-coalition) bomb exploded in a neighborhood, stated that EVERY SINGLE house in the neighborhood lost a child.  As heartless as this sounds, I don't believe him.  For some reason, I feel it may be a cultural thing or something, it seems that the Iraqis (and possible others in the region) use exaggeration as a rule to emphasize things (Think Iraqi Foreign Minister...).
So, the whole situation sucks.  I don't like that the world is where it is right now, but it always seems that the media, regardless of the origin, is always trying to do the "bleeding heart" thing.  "Look at these unfortunate innocent people", "They didn't do anything wrong, the big, bad US did it."

When our own media vilifies our military for carrying out every single operation, how do we expect the world to have an educated opinion on things and just deal with the facts?  Why is it that the only facts that are stated are ones that side against our military?

I'm sure some people will completely disagree with me.  I hope that, if you do, you can reply here without resorting to inflammatory statements.  This is a heated topic and we all know it can get tempers flaring.  I would like to have a discussion on it if you are so inclined.

Tom
posted by Tom with 1 Comments

Clearly there is something seriously wrong with people....

Out there, there are women who, as a result of some flawed genetics no doubt, want to wear $3000 hand bags.  These are not childhood playmates of the Hiltons'.  These are working women.  I used to work with one.  She actually purchased a $3000 Prada hand bag.  To belabor a point: She purchased a small 4x8 inch pouch made of cloth, not gold, that is used to hold Kleenex, lipstick, money and occasionally tampons for THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS!  She's putting tampons in a $3000 bag!

OK, for those women who still have the "I have to have the $3000 hand bag to go out somewhere" gene, but the "holy crap, I can't afford that so I'm not going to do it" gene is still in place, these people have come to your rescue.

So, you can go out with your tampons safely tucked into your $3000 (rented) bag for the night and be completely paranoid about losing it for a whole evening.  How enjoyable.

Idiots.

Please don't breed.
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Grag Bag

I often find myself blogging just 2 lines and pointing to another news article online.  I decided that, rather than stopping doing this, I would just combine a bunch together to make it a little less lame.

So, here goes:

1) For all those annoying people who say "It's ridiculous to stop serving peanuts on a plane" and "oh.. you can just take the nuts off that cake and eat it", here is an example of why people need to be more sensitive to food allergies.  If that doesn't make you think more about it, then you're (notice I actually used an apostrophe and "re" there... huh?) a heartless bastard and you can go screw yourself.

2) Sick of navigating the labyrinth of "press 1 for toys, 2 for lubricants, etc"?  (what!?)  Well, this guy is great.  He's got a website that gives shortcuts to phone systems to that you can talk to something with a pulse.

3) This is just plain hilarious.  It's like something out of a bad sitcom..

4) I was just talking with someone about idiots burning stuff down with turkey friers...  It's pretty common, apparently.

5) Thankfully, some people in the middle east are acting (a bit) rationally about the terrorist attacks out there.  Apparently, Al-Zarqawi's family in Jordan has disowned him for attacking innocent children.  I don't know why this kind of thing took so long, but it is very welcome to me.

6) Google proves that you don't have to let the business weenies run everything.

That's it for this one..
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Separation of church and State

I came across this article in the Baltimore Sun (my home town newspaper) and it reminded me of the age old "separation of church and State" argument.

I don't understand what can be clearer.  "Under God" is religious.  Period.  Full Stop (if you're British).  It should not be and should never have been in the Pledge of Allegiance.  The Pledge of Allegiance is "...to the United States of America...", not to some religion's idea of a creator.  People who do not believe in a higher being are specifically forced to speak these words or to be singled out.  Either way, it is blatant discrimination based on religion, which is specifically forbidden by the Constitution.

Every time this makes it to courts, judges (who are elected!) wind up either 1) pussying out and refusing to hear a case on a technicality, or 2) Legislating instead of Judging by ignoring the law and leaving it there.

Religious people, often fanatically so, have great power in this country.  This came to mind when I was watching The Daily Show with John Stewart and Keira Knightley (*pause for all the guys to wipe up the drool*) said that Americans don't swear enough.  Brits do it all the time.  They don't have the Bible Belt in the UK, do they?

Anyway, this could turn into an all day rant.  "God" doesn't belong on our currency or in our pledge of allegiance or in our court rooms.  The country may have been founded by religious men, but the specifically guaranteed freedom of religion for a reason: so that people could not be harrassed or discriminated against for their religion.  Official sanction of religion (in any form) is a form of discrimination to those who don't believe.

</rant>

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

The audacity of Sony

The audacity of Sony in handling this "root kit" disaster of theirs leaves me nearly apoplectic...

Bruce Schneier writes a great article at Wired about the whole situation and points out some really great reasons to get really pissed off:  If you don't know of Bruce, he is a great resource for computer users' rights and is always fighting for the "right thing" when it comes to software.  Everything he writes is very cogent and on the mark; it really makes you think.

Anyway, here's a very small background on this issue:
  • In 2004, Sony decides that they want to watch what they do with the CDs that you BOUGHT from them on your computer.
  • Sony adds secret software to their CDs so that when you put them in your machine, it installs without your knowledge.  This software watches what you do with Sony's CDs and sends that information back to Sony!
  • In order to avoid detection, Sony installs what is called a "root kit" that allows them to hide the existence of this software.
  • This software can't be removed without crashing Windows.
  • Sony executives just act like a bunch of elitist pricks saying things like "Most people don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  • Sony issues a "fix" that removes the cloaking of the software, but doesn't remove the software itself!
  • It turns out that some included software in there might actually be violating other people's Copyright, which is exactly what they were supposedly trying to prevent!
  • People have now written viruses that take advantage of Sony's installed software to hide themselves from the rest of the machine (including anti-virus software as far as I know).
  • Sony has yet to actually issue a removal tool that actually removes.
  • The number of machines with this root kit installed on it number over 1/2 million and some of those are in the DoD... not good.
  • Your anti-virus software does NOT remove this....
Read the article for other details and reasons to get mad.

This makes me so mad that we bought a Sony TV the other day for my mother-in-law.  I will not buy Sony products anymore.  How about you?

To
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Can we force a state to leave the Union?

Kan-fucking-ansas....

These asshats have voted to destroy the integrity of Science in their classrooms and to become the laughing stock of the entire world.

I mean, for Christ's sake, even the Vatican is saying that these people are dumb (my interpretation)!

I am now going to try to see if there's a hurricane generator somewhere I can send in the direction of the Kansas board of education...

Update: At least the people in Dover, PA got it right and booted every single member of the Board of Education that was up for re-election.

That just rocks!
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

From the "Duh!" Department...

George Takei has come out of the closet

You know the one; it has no clothes in it, is completely transparent and everyone can see into it.  The one with people all standing around saying "Doesn't he know we can see him in there?".

For those who can't envision this, here's an artist's (my) rendition:

(NOTE: You can see him...) I mean tell me this man is straight:



OK, all stupid stereotypes aside.  Who cares?  If people don't stop pointing out things like this, things will never be any different.  It is just like people who point out that (fictitious person) Mary Johnson was the first Lesbian African American Superintendant of Schools for Wichita, Kansas.  Again, where do you draw the line?  When is it just not significant? 

If people want to be treated like what they do/are/feel is normal, they have to stop making a big event out of their "normal" lives/activiites.
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

At least she didn't use the "foot wedge" like I do..

Michelle Wie, whose rise in women's golf has been chronicled more than Tom Cruise's insanity, was disqualified for a bad drop that she didn't tell anybody about.  Depending on who you believe, it was either 3 or up to 15 inches closer to the hole. 

Let me restate this -- On a hole, which was probably 400-500 YARDS long, in basically an open field of grass, she accidentally moved the ball between 0.0167% and 0.1042% of the distance to the hole.  If you consider that most pros can easily hit 200 yards with an iron, that would mean that, on her next shot, she gained an advantage of between 0.042% and 0.208% of the distance of that shot.

I say they didn't punish her enough by disqualifying her and taking away the 30,000 British Pounds she would have won for her efforts.  I think they should strip her naked and make her run around the whole course shouting "I am a cheater!!!!".

Give me a break.
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Unintelligible Design..

So.. *thump*, *thump*, the fundamentalist whackos (and I use that term in the purely scientific definition) are trying to push Intelligent Design (aka: The Bible Creation story) into Science classes in school.  This is a topic that raises my blood pressure through the roof every time I think about it.

I don't care about your beliefs.  You don't have to care about mine.  What you do have to care about in a Science Class is that the children should be tought... wait for it.... SCIENCE!!!  Intelligent Design, as I have stated before, is hogwash.  It inserts Religious Punting (tm) -- the practice of replacing "I don't know" with "God wanted it that way" -- into any questions about the origin of life and everything else. 

Bradamant had a really good discussion on her blog about it and it got me thinking.  The posting also refers to a hilarious post at Slate about the same topic that made me chuckle and think "yeah...  why make the discussion so complicated?  Humor usually hits home a little better with people who have no idea what Science means anyway".

But, frankly, anything that makes self-righteous know-it-all religious types who make assertions without any basis for them look dumb is great reading to me.
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Religious nuts are ruining this country

If we don't stop this soon, we are going to be in a world of hurt.

This stuff really, really scares me.

Someone actually thought this was rational enough to file a lawsuit with a straight face:
A group representing religious schools in California is suing the University of California system. At issue, the question of whether creationist courses in high school are counted as science credit for college admissions.
THE CREATION STORY IS NOT SCIENCE!!!!

Hell, there are TWO creation stories in the Bible anyway!  You can only have one accepted theory of anything.  Nevermind that there are no scientific measurements or anything else in the Bible referring to Creation.  There is no supporting evidence OF ANY KIND for the Creation story.

This makes me so angry, I want to hurt these idiots.

Update: I wonder what they think about this story.  Faked results?  God's just not very inventive and reuses the same patterns over and over again?

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Oh my GOD Magnum!

OK, this has nothing to do with Magnum, P.I. That's just what went through my head when I read this:

They're now allowing kids to swear in school!
And this from the Brits!

Sure, kids swear, but actually being allowed to say the "f word" in class??

That's just ri-effing-diculous!
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

It amazes me that this kind of ignorant crap still happens

Some ignorant waitress in New Jersey identified a table as "Jew Couple" on their bill.  That is so un-f-ing-believable.  How do people get to be so intolerant?  It boggles my mind.

In a fair world, that girl would be sterile.

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Microsoft is trying to screw us again... I know you're shocked

If you want to watch DRM-enabled video on Windows Vista, you'll have to buy a new monitor!

Well, you don't HAVE to, but the video will be blurred. 

That is so obnoxious it makes me want to hurt someone.

As if they needed to do more to alienate people...

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

The Police (in general) have completely lost their minds...

No, I'm not talking about Sting's old cronies...

I'm talking about the morons who, along with a district attorney, were charging an 11-year old girl with a felony for throwing a rock at boys who were pelting her with water baloons...

Umm... sounds like pretty normal kid's behavior to me.  Well, except the rock was a little bigger than normal.
Still, "During her five days in detention, Maribel was reportedly granted one 30-minute visit by her parents."

An 11-year old girl was denied access to her parents for FIVE DAYS?  WTF is wrong with these people?

It's not like she shot these kids... they were riding by on bicycles hitting her with water balloons...  It was a normal response.  I might even do the same thing and I'm 33! 

Anyway, this kind of stuff is ridiculous.
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

This is just so shameful

Sometimes, I try to make up funny things to say about news headlines and things, but, frankly, this is almost as horrifying to me as the Enron (et.al) scandals.

Sony to Pay $1.5M Over Fake Movie Critic (AP)

Some MADE UP a film critic in order to make up their own reviews for their movies.  That is frankly appalling.  There are SOOO many critics, how could they not find any that said what they wanted?  So ridiculous.  And they only have to pay $1.5 million.

T
posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Do you remember when.....

...NASA was the place that all little kids thought was filled with geniuses?

Now, they're a bunch of buffoons pissing away all our tax money.

Come on... 2 1/2 YEARS and > $1 BILLION dollars and they still don't have this crap fixed yet??  WTF?

Idiots!

posted by Tom (Comments Off)

Un-Mother-F-ing Believable!

First, they want to stop using red ink while grading papers because it is so negative that it might hurt your whining little sissy of a child's feelings.

Now this:

Liz Beattie, a retired teacher, will call on the association's annual gathering in Buxton, Derbyshire, to "delete the word 'fail' from the educational vocabulary to be replaced with the concept of 'deferred success'".

DEFERRED SUCCESS?  WTF!?

Pretty soon kids will be pulled from one womb and dropped right in another womb and deprived of all contact with the outside world, because there might be something negative out there.

We need to take these little maggots out of this Nerf world we're making for them and introduce them to the world of:
  1. Pain (spank them, they deserve it)
  2. Suffering (don't give them everything they want)
  3. Ridicule (doesn't matter... everybody needs some)
  4. Derision
  5. Sharp corners on counter tops (stop running into things dumbass!)
  6. Completely accessible electrical sockets (stop sticking metal things in there dumbass!)
  7. Red ink and lots of it.
  8. Scissors with sharp edges that you have to run with in gym class.
  9. Last but not least: LAWN DARTS!

posted by Tom with 1 Comments

Bennifer Part Deux

Apparently, being a bad actor and mediocre poker player really drives the women crazy...

Jennifer Garner sold her sou... married Ben Affleck

In Comic Book Movie World, would we call them Elec-Devil or Dared-ectra?
posted by Tom (Comments Off)